Back to Development Hub
Modernization
Technical Debt Reduction
Strategic technical debt reduction services. We identify, quantify, and systematically eliminate technical debt that slows your team and increases operational risk.
Get Started45%
Avg Cost Savings
3x
Developer Speed
Zero-Downtime
Migrations
Legacy-Free
Code
Service Category
Technical Debt Management
Ideal For
Engineering teams spending excessive time on debt-related work instead of feature development.
Timeline
4 – 12 weeks
Why Choose MicrocosmWorks for Technical Debt Reduction?
Technical debt compounds like financial debt — ignore it long enough and it consumes most of your engineering capacity. We bring systematic approaches to debt identification, prioritization, and elimination. We quantify debt in business terms (developer hours wasted, incidents caused) and create reduction plans that deliver measurable velocity improvements.
Our Technical Debt Reduction Capabilities
- Debt Quantification — Map and measure technical debt across your system — outdated dependencies, missing tests, architectural shortcuts, and operational risks.
- Priority Framework — Score debt by business impact (velocity drag, incident risk, hiring difficulty) to focus effort where it generates the most value.
- Dependency Modernization — Update outdated frameworks, libraries, and runtimes with comprehensive testing to eliminate security vulnerabilities and unlock features.
- Architecture Simplification — Remove unnecessary complexity, consolidate redundant systems, and simplify deployment topology.
- Operational Debt — Fix flaky tests, improve build times, fix deployment reliability, and eliminate toil from on-call rotations.
- Sustainable Practices — Establish engineering practices (debt budgets, golden paths, architecture decision records) that prevent future debt accumulation.
Technology Stack
We use code analysis tools (SonarQube, CodeClimate, Snyk), dependency tracking (Renovate, Dependabot), and custom metrics dashboards to quantify and track debt reduction progress. Our approach integrates with your existing CI/CD to prevent new debt from being introduced.
Who This Is For
Engineering teams spending more than 30% of their time on debt-related work — fighting flaky tests, working around architectural limitations, dealing with incidents from aging infrastructure, or struggling with painfully slow development cycles. We help you reclaim that time for feature development.
Our Process
1
Debt Inventory
Catalog all technical debt across codebase, infrastructure, and processes. Quantify impact in developer hours.
2
Prioritization
Score debt items by business impact, risk, and effort. Create phased reduction roadmap.
3
Quick Wins
Eliminate high-impact, low-effort debt items first to demonstrate immediate velocity improvements.
4
Structural Improvements
Address architectural debt, modernize core dependencies, and fix systemic issues that affect the whole team.
5
Prevention Framework
Establish debt budgets, quality gates, architectural governance, and sustainable engineering practices.
Technology Stack
Analysis
SonarQubeCodeClimateSnyknpm auditRenovate
Automation
DependabotGitHub ActionsRenovatesemantic-release
Monitoring
DORA MetricsCycle TimeDeploy FrequencyMTTR
Practices
ADRsTech RadarGolden PathsRFC Process
Industries We Serve
SaaSEnterpriseFinTechHealthTechE-CommerceMedia
Ready to Eliminate Technical Debt?
Let's create a systematic plan to reduce debt, increase velocity, and make engineering enjoyable again.
Frequently Asked Questions
We analyze code complexity metrics, test coverage gaps, dependency vulnerabilities, architectural coupling, deployment friction, and developer experience pain points to quantify technical debt and prioritize reduction efforts by business impact.
Technical debt reduction services at MicrocosmWorks are priced at $15-$40/hour. We create a prioritized backlog that tackles the most impactful debt first, delivering measurable improvements in developer velocity and system reliability.
Yes, we integrate debt reduction into your sprint workflow by allocating a consistent percentage of capacity to debt reduction, combining refactoring with feature work when possible, and prioritizing debt items that directly block or slow feature development.
We use SonarQube for code quality metrics, CodeClimate for maintainability scoring, dependency scanners like Snyk for security debt, custom scripts for architecture analysis, and DORA metrics to measure how debt impacts deployment velocity.
We implement automated quality gates in CI/CD pipelines, establish coding standards with automated linting, set up architectural fitness functions, conduct regular code reviews, and create dashboards that track debt metrics over time.